Leader: Between Exist And Not Exist

Within an organization, be it in the company, institution, or an association, the existence of a leader is vital. Character and style led a leader will greatly affect the performance of every member who joined in the organization. Leadership is important in organization.

It is true that every leader that no one is perfect, there are the weaknesses of every leader, although a bit. However, intelligent leader is a leader who can cover up weaknesses by maximizing the power he has. So what if the leader in an organization can not issue a strength or perhaps even more weakness? Then wait for the destruction of the organization.

In one organization there may be a leader who says "between exist and not exist".

Said to exist as a physical fact and the structure,there is a leader, but the leader has been found not exist because it does not contribute at all to the organization. No decisions are made, there is no direction to go, and do not understand the environmental conditions of men and institutions. In other words, the existence of these leaders did not affect the progress of an organization. Organizations are left adrift in the uncertainty of not knowing the objectives to be achieved, even strategic instruction was not there at all.

If an organization has leaders who are "between exist and not exist", so watch the destruction. Because sooner or later its members will slowly leave his concern for the organization. Great ideas they have only limited ideas without execution because fettered by uncertainty. And in the they will lazy to work, despair, individualism, no team works, and egoism will upon them.

Leaders must have good attitude and communication, because attitude and communication is important in organization. A good leadership is a leader who is able to control and mobilize all of its members in achieving the vision and mission of the organization. Leaders who will be respected by his subordinates is a leader who can deliver a decision for its members, and they are not afraid of making decisions. Because in principle, better to have a decision in the organization even though it's wrong when compared to no decision at all.